Signal · XMR mean-reversion · paper-trade phase

Signal: Monero mean-reversion

When Monero jumps hard, it tends to give some back the next day — and when it crashes, it tends to bounce. We measured this over 8.7 years of daily prices.

The trade is the simplest possible expression of that: fade yesterday’s move — short after a pop, buy after a drop — on Hyperliquid, where XMR trades 24/7.

Status: PAPER-TRADE PHASE — validating live, no capital committed. Not investment advice.

The effect, in two numbers
3,172 daily closes · 2017-11-092026-07-16
+1.33%
avg next-day return after a >5% down day (290 cases)
-0.51%
avg next-day return after a >5% up day (301 cases)
-0.1367
1-day autocorrelation (negative = reverses)

Computed directly from the 3,172 daily closes in our own price feed — no model, just averages. Big drops have, on average, been followed by an up day; big pops by a down day. That asymmetry is the entire signal.

Why Monero

Monero barely follows Bitcoin anymore — over the last two years, Bitcoin explains only ~19% of its daily variance (R² 0.19). It lives in its own universe for a real structural reason: as a privacy coin it has been serially delisted from regulated exchanges (Binance 2024, Kraken-EEA 2024, dozens more), so its price-moving events are its own regulatory calendar, not crypto’s. Those shocks knock the price around, and a thin market with a stubborn base of privacy-demand holders tends to snap part-way back — which is exactly the statistical signature we measure: genuine 1-day mean reversion (autocorrelation −0.14, variance ratios significantly below 1).

The evidence
backtest, net of real Hyperliquid costs
MeasureValueWhat it means
Test window8.7 yearsNov 2017 → Jul 2026, every day included
Observations3,170 daily returnsno cherry-picked sub-period
t-statistic (net)3.07unlikely to be luck, not impossible
Sharpe ratio (net)~1.0return per unit of risk, after fees
Calendar years positive9 of 102025 was the losing year
Costs assumed9 bps per flipreal Hyperliquid taker fees, both sides
Venue checkreplicates on Hyperliquid's own candles184 traded days — consistency check, not proof

Same discipline as everything else on this site: every parameter cell tested is reported, chronological in-sample / out-of-sample split, costs charged on every position flip. The strategy was also the first specification we wrote down, not the best cell of a grid.

The honest catch
The data it runs on
real daily closes · log scale · illustrative
$50$100$200$400201820192020202120222023202420252026

Monero daily close, 2017-11-092026-07-16, from our own price feed — the exact series the backtest ran on. The violence is the point: the big single-day spikes and crashes visible here are what the signal fades. Illustrative of the input data; this chart is not a P&L — no live track record exists yet.

Where this stands

PAPER-TRADE PHASE — validating live, no capital committed. This is a modest, decaying edge that cleared honest testing and real costs; it is not “proven” and we do not call it alpha. If live paper fills match the backtest over 30+ days, a small gated pilot follows — and if they don’t, this page will say so. See the process working at /leadlag and /track-record.

Previously tested and retired: W-1 (funding stress → bond funds) — withdrawn after a data-alignment error was found in our own re-check. Details.